My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1997-10-02
CITY-OF-BATESVILLE
>
City Clerk
>
Ordinances
>
1997
>
1997-10-02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2016 9:30:33 AM
Creation date
6/3/2016 9:30:17 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Section 4.7 D shall be modified to read as follows, and Section E and F, shall be added as <br /> follows: <br /> D. Retrofit Of Existing Systems This applies to an existing fire protection system <br /> which is being modified, extended, or enlarged. Such systems include a <br /> modification or extension to an existing network such as (distribution piping, <br /> sprinkler heads, control valves, etc. are added to an existing system), or where an <br /> additional fire protection system (new feed line, riser, control valve, distribution <br /> piping, sprinkler heads, etc.) is added to an existing system. If any of the <br /> conditions are met the system will be required to be upgraded to meet minimum <br /> standards <br /> E. The installation of properly sized assembly may cause an excessive pressure loss in <br /> some altered Class 1 and 2 systems. Such loss could make the system <br /> noncompliant with NFPA Pamphlets 13 and 14 as adopted. The Responsible <br /> Managing Employee shall document to the Approving Authority that reasonable <br /> modifications will not compensate for the additional loss. The documentation shall <br /> contain a listing of the minimum flow and pressure, headloss summary, desired and <br /> calculated sprinkler head output and a summary of the options examined to reduce <br /> headloss. For these installations, if not already installed, the existing cross <br /> connection control device will be replaced with two check valves in series (one of <br /> which can be the alarm valve), each valve meeting AWWA C508-82, UL 312-88, <br /> • or UL 193-88, or the latest versions thereof, and equipped with a resilient seating <br /> surface. The valves or adjacent piping shall be equipped with a sufficient number <br /> of resilient seated test cocks (minimum diameter of one quarter to one-half inch) to <br /> determine the effectiveness of each valve (there shall be no leakage past any check <br /> valve). Sufficient resilient seated isolation valves - one valve upstream of the <br /> valves and one valve downstream of the valves - shall be present or added to the <br /> system to permit this testing. <br /> F. Existing Systems Existing fire protection systems, which have no single check <br /> valves or alarm valves are required to meet the minimum standards for a Class 1 <br /> and 2 fire protection system. The minimum protection for cross connection <br /> control for existing systems is the same as listed for new systems, except for <br /> existing systems which have a minimum of a single check valve. The check valve <br /> must have 2 resilient seated test cocks installed, one up stream and one <br /> downstream of the valve to determine the effectiveness of the valve. The <br /> performance testing of the check valve shall be preformed at intervals <br /> predetermined by the Approving Authority. Should a check valve fail during any <br /> performance test, it will automatically be subject to upgrade to meet the minimum <br /> for protection requirements. <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.